Special Investment Report – November 1, 2010
SPECIAL INVESTMENT UPDATE
November 1, 2010
Dear Friends and Clients,
We are sending this special update because we felt that financial and tax planning is vitally important during 2010 and we wanted to encourage you to review your particular situation in time for you to act before the end of the year. Before we get into the investment portion of our update, let’s take this opportunity to go over some administrative policies and procedures regarding our wealth management services. By way of background, we created Farmand Investment Services, Inc. on December 14, 2001 but we have been providing investment management services since 1997 and we have made an intensive effort to provide you the best level of service.
As previously discussed, effective January 1, 2011, our fee structure with reference to our portfolio management services will change in accordance with the enclosed fee schedule. This decision was made with a great deal of deliberation, especially now with the current state of the economy. However, please understand that this decision to adjust the fees is intended as a permanent adjustment to our fee structure and was made after a detailed evaluation of our wealth management services over an extended period of time. During this period of evaluation of our Investment Management Services, we utilized investment seminars, quarterly updates as well as special updates, such as this, as a medium to provide you more detail about our services, the investment climate in general as well as our goals for the following year. Our goal has always been to provide you a healthier financial life, above and beyond your investments by providing you as much insight into financial planning so that you can make informed decisions. As in the past, we truly value our business relationship and we will continue to always strive to provide you with the best level of service. We welcome the opportunity to discuss this issue or any other matter with you.
We sincerely hope you understand the reasons for the increase of your annual fixed fee which will be billed on a quarterly basis beginning with the billing for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. Please review the enclosed fee schedule and kindly sign, date and return to us in the enclosed envelope.
Also, I would like to follow up on our December 10, 2009 letter explaining some of the changes to the reporting policies that we provide, specifically regarding the Investment Policy Statement. As we explained in that letter, we have historically completed one Investment Policy Statement for each set of household accounts upon our initial set up of the combined Family Portfolio Management agreement. Going forward, our firm will require an Investment Policy Statement for each individual account to more accurately execute the unique objectives of each account. Even though some household accounts would prefer to utilize the same objective on all of their accounts, others may not. Initially, unless precluded by the client’s investment objectives and risk tolerance, the Investment Policy Statement of all taxable accounts shall maintain a formulation of our targeted asset allocation mix of approximately 50% fixed and 50% equity. The Investment Policy Statement of all retirement accounts shall generally maintain a formulation of our targeted asset allocation mix that is weighted more heavily on the equity side. We can always customize each account’s Investment Policy Statement to correspond with its unique objectives where appropriate. I would like to emphasize that this process was a one-time “catch up” period because each account may have its own individual unique goals. Please contact me if there are any questions or if you want to discuss this matter further.
Lastly, in early 2010, we undertook an effort to improve and enhance the Farmand, Farmand & Farmand, PA, CPA website, including adding more information related to our wealth management services. In the future, we intend to establish a link to our website for our investment newsletter. We welcome any suggestions you have for how the site could be more useful and easier to use. Please send your suggestions to mike@farmandcpa.com.
Now, let’s go over the investment portion of our update by going over the current investment climate in general as well as to discuss our strategy for the remainder of 2010 and 2011.
Since 2000, we have endured two horrendous bear markets. The first, from 2000 to 2002, let the air out of a wildly inflated speculative mania pumped up by the arrival of the Internet. The second, and more sinister, bear struck in 2007-2009, when valuations seemed much more reasonable than in 2000. However, excessive debt-mortgage debt in particular – trumped all other factors. The deleveraging process among households continues to this day, throwing a wet blanket on the U. S. economic recovery. To stop the economy and financial system from imploding, Washington took off on an unprecedented deficit – spending spree.
Global stock markets, most definitely including our own, have enjoyed a strong recovery since March 2009, despite the recent unsettling “correction”. But the bull will not run forever. Consumers may be reducing debt, but the federal government’s debt has soared more than 4 trillion dollars in the past three years, to $13.3 trillion dollars at last glance. To date, Uncle Sam has had no difficulty selling bonds at rock-bottom interest rates. By 2012, though, the government will face a greater fiscal crunch as the number of baby boomers reaching 65 (the age for Medicare eligibility) spikes. Washington’s debt-to-GDP ratio will soar to 100% – typically, the level at which a country’s creditors begin to rebel. In short, there is a serious risk of another deep bear market in 2012, perhaps extending into 2013.
Given this outlook, you might be tempted to head for the hills! But, if the U.S. Government’s budget woes are not adequately addressed before 2012, the economic recovery has built up enough momentum to probably lift share prices up another 12 to 15% or more. Yes, the housing sector is still in dreadful shape. But manufacturing is steadily improving, with industrial production up 7.7% in the past year. Many export-oriented technology companies are booming. Service industries, for the most part are doing OK. Retail sales, while still below the 2007 peak, have gained 5.5% from a year ago. Barring an external shock, the European situation looks a lot healthier today than it did a few months back.
Election fever is running high as politicians blitz the airwaves and their posters swarm the streets ahead of the November 2nd climax. Clearly the makeup of the next Congress will have a significant impact, for better or worse, on taxes, regulation and government spending. However, America urgently needs to address the long-term fiscal problems created by the retiring Baby Boomers. But the financial markets aren’t a simple, one-button machine. Numerous factors influence stock prices. The truth is, investors are always faced with uncertainty, even in what may seem to be the best of times. Asset allocation is a strategy used to reduce the risk of that uncertain world to a manageable minimum. What that means, in plain English, is that we never put all our eggs in one basket. We own a globally diversified mix of stocks, bonds and cash, with dozens of individual securities to provide an extra layer of protection.
As you know, all of our portfolio reports are now set up where each account has its own targeted asset allocation mix formulation between “equity” and “fixed” investments, based on the Family Portfolio Management agreement, unless it was revised. What percentage would I place in a new client’s portfolio (over time)? Even though each client has their own individual goals, my own personal current portfolio is earmarked 60% for stocks and 40% for fixed income investments. That’s very close to the norm I have followed for the past 20 years. For most investors a 60/40 allocation delivers enough upside participation to keep most of us happy in good markets, with enough of a cushion to let most of us sleep soundly in tough markets. These percentages should be adjusted to fit each one’s particular own situation. People in their 20s, 30s and 40s may feel comfortable with a larger weighting in equities. Folks approaching or already in, retirement might shade the equity percentage lower. One helpful rule of thumb: To compute the percentage of your portfolio that should be in risk assets (those that don’t offer a guaranteed payback), take 115 minus your age. Thus, a 60 year-old would shoot for a 55% “normal” weighting in stocks and other risk assets. The actual percentage at any given time might vary with market conditions and personal circumstances.
As the current stock market cycle matures, our strategy is to take more profits on equities and increase our weighting in fixed income. The next bear market is probably some distance off, but we will want to move gradually into a more defensive position as the final peak for the cycle comes into view.
In the fixed-income area, speculation over the Federal Reserve’s next quantitative-easing (bond-buying) move dropped the 10-year Treasury yield to a new 2010 low of 2.33% on October 8th. But long-dated Treasuries didn’t follow suit; the 30-year yield held above its August low. This type of divergence points to a rebound soon in bond yields, which could raise the 10-year Treasury yield back up to the 3% range by year- end. Our strategy in the fixed income area has been and will continue to be to keep our maturities short (generally under five years) until we see how strong the next bounce in yields turns out to be.
As we head down the home stretch, it’s beginning to look as if 2010 may turn out to be a pretty good year after all! For equity investors, especially, it’s nice to see the DOW within striking distance of its second winning year in a row. This is quite a change from the dark days of October 2008, when the financial world came perilously close to breaking apart at the seams.
As always, of course, we are more interested in the future than in the past. And here, we must inject a note of caution. The powerful run-up in global stock markets since late August will be a tough act to follow. Granted, the Federal Reserve and other Central banks are pushing hard to “stimulate” business activity through near-zero interest rates, quantitative easing and related gimmicks. In the end, though, the U.S. economy is likely to keep growing at a subdued pace in 2011, bringing a much more modest growth rate for corporate earnings (probably 10% or less) than we have had this year.